ACA-New: 2025 Marketplace Integrity and Affordability Proposed Rule=Lots of changes

Duaine

Guru
1000 Post Club
Shortening the Annual Open Enrollment Period for Individual Market Coverage

CMS proposes changing the annual OEP for all individual market coverage to run from November 1 through December 15 preceding the coverage year, instead of through January 15 of the coverage year. This adjustment would apply to both on- and off-Marketplace individual market coverage. This proposal aims to reduce consumer confusion, streamline the enrollment process, align more closely with open enrollment dates for many employer-based health plans, encourage continuous coverage, and reduce the risk of adverse selection from consumers who otherwise may wait to enroll until they need health care services.

Verifying Consumer Income Eligibility for Insurance Affordability Programs

Addressing Failure to File and Reconcile


CMS proposes to reinstate its 2015 policy requiring Exchanges to determine an individual ineligible for APTC if they (or their tax filer) failed to file their federal income tax and reconcile APTC for one year, instead of for two consecutive tax years as implemented in the 2024 Payment Notice. Under this proposed change, the Marketplace must determine a tax filer ineligible for APTC if (1) CMS notifies the Marketplace that the tax filer or someone in their household received APTC for a prior year for which tax data would be utilized for verification of income and (2) the tax filer or someone in their household did not comply with the requirement to file a tax return and reconcile APTC for that year. This change aims to minimize improper enrollments and protect consumers from accumulating tax liabilities.

Verifying Income When Data Sources Indicate Household Income Less than 100% of the Federal Poverty Level

CMS proposes to require Marketplaces to generate annual income inconsistencies in certain circumstances when a tax filer's attested projected annual household income is equal to or greater than 100% of the FPL and no more than 400% of the FPL, while the income data returned by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Social Security Administration, or current income data sources are less than 100% of the FPL. This proposed policy would improve program integrity, reduce the burden of APTC on the federal taxpayer, and benefit consumers by ensuring subsidies are appropriately allocated and reducing their risk of improper tax liabilities.

Verifying Income When Tax Data is Unavailable

CMS proposes changes to strengthen the verification process for income eligibility by removing the requirement that Marketplaces accept an applicant's or enrollee's self-attestation of projected annual household income when the Marketplace requests tax return data from the IRS to verify attested projected annual household income but the IRS confirms there is no such tax return data available. Under this proposal, Marketplaces would be required to verify income with other trusted data sources (if available) and follow the alternative verification process, which requires applicants to submit documentary evidence or otherwise resolve the income inconsistency. This proposed policy would improve program integrity by reducing the risk of improper enrollments, benefit consumers by helping reduce surprise tax liabilities, and reduce annual APTC expenditures.

Reducing Improper Enrollments through Annual Eligibility Redeterminations and SEPs

Requiring $5 Premium Responsibility


CMS proposes to modify the annual eligibility redetermination process by requiring Marketplaces to ensure that consumers who are automatically re-enrolled without affirming or updating their eligibility information, and who would have been automatically re-enrolled in a QHP with a fully subsidized premium after the application of APTC, to instead be automatically re-enrolled with a $5 monthly premium. Once consumers confirm their eligibility, the $5 monthly bill could be eliminated. Any premium paid would potentially be rebated to the enrollee when they file and reconcile their APTC on their taxes if they remain eligible for a fully-subsidized premium. This proposed policy would potentially reduce improper enrollments and surprise tax liabilities, benefiting consumers by increasing awareness and engagement in their health coverage decisions, ensuring that their coverage aligns with their current needs and eligibility.

Removing Re-enrollment Hierarchy Standards

CMS proposes to remove the provision of current regulations that allows Marketplaces to automatically re-enroll CSR-eligible enrollees from a bronze to a silver QHP if the silver QHP is in the same product, has the same provider network, and has a lower or equivalent net premium as the bronze plan into which the enrollee would otherwise have been re-enrolled. This proposal benefits consumers by respecting consumer choice and reducing confusion caused by changing a consumer's plan from bronze to silver, even when their existing bronze plan remains available. The proposed changes also decrease the likelihood of unexpected tax liabilities related to re-enrolling bronze enrollees into a silver plan without their knowledge.

[EXTERNAL LINK] - 2025 Marketplace Integrity and Affordability Proposed Rule | CMS
 

Attachments

  • 2025 Marketplace Integrity and Affordability Proposed Rule _ CMS.pdf
    263.3 KB · Views: 3
Well we now know how trump is thinking . This will extend to Medicare I believe .
1. No more monthly sep's for low income as they were risk adverse
2. Matching up tax return reconciliation at 1 yr instead of 2. If no tax return found they stop subsidies
3. Verifying sep's and if verification not provided no enrollment
4. it appears limited or no auto enrollments . It appears you must go through income verification yearly ( not clear on this)
5. Enrollment period only 6 weeks nov 1 to Dec 15.
6. It appears agents can be termed for cause much easier lieing on enrollments .


My take on this is the days of lieing on income especially the 30% that made under the limit over with . Rolling plans over with during the yr . Once you pick a plan it's locked in for the yr . I can see overall enrollment falling 20-30% . That's before we even find out how much subsidies falls . They hay day of Aca for the agent coming to an end . I expect similar contraction in Medicare
 
CMS proposes changing the annual OEP for all individual market coverage to run from November 1 through December 15 preceding the coverage year, instead of through January 15 of the coverage year.
ACA carriers usually release their plan details a few days before the enrollment season starts. It's not like Medicare with 10/1 plan release dates and a standardized buffer zone. Sometimes there are significant changes and they don't even do the carrier training by 11/1. Having these ACA/Medicare enrollment seasons nearly completely overlapping would be a challenge.

the Marketplace must determine a tax filer ineligible for APTC if (1) CMS notifies the Marketplace that the tax filer or someone in their household received APTC for a prior year for which tax data would be utilized for verification of income and (2) the tax filer or someone in their household did not comply with the requirement to file a tax return and reconcile APTC for that year.
Yeah, you gotta file taxes (extensions are OK) to keep your credits. No argument here. It's Jan 2025 and you haven't filed 2023? Just too much tax credits sloshing around to go multiple years without reconciling. If the entire system is based on tax credits, it needs to be backed by tax filing.

when a tax filer's attested projected annual household income is equal to or greater than 100% of the FPL and no more than 400% of the FPL, while the income data returned by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Social Security Administration, or current income data sources are less than 100% of the FPL.
I agree that those eligible for Medicaid should be on Medicaid. No reason to provide massive public subsidies for private insurance when there is no way (and there never will be a way) to "claw back" tax credits for those who make too little to qualify for them. The border line between the Medicaid/ACA programs is a nightmare for people caught in the middle. Making it way too easy to get ACA with huge credits just isn't the right fix. Streamline the Medicaid enrollment process instead to make sure people who are being proactive don't have gaps in coverage.

removing the requirement that Marketplaces accept an applicant's or enrollee's self-attestation of projected annual household income when the Marketplace requests tax return data from the IRS to verify attested projected annual household income but the IRS confirms there is no such tax return data available.
Well....the ACA is based on PROJECTED INCOME, and it's hard to prove the future using a past tax return...so what do you want people to do who have had recent life/income changes? The process of reviewing the life change documents has always been mysterious and inconsistent. No easy answers here.

requiring Marketplaces to ensure that consumers who are automatically re-enrolled without affirming or updating their eligibility information, and who would have been automatically re-enrolled in a QHP with a fully subsidized premium after the application of APTC, to instead be automatically re-enrolled with a $5 monthly premium. Once consumers confirm their eligibility, the $5 monthly bill could be eliminated.
$0 plans attract scummy "sales" people and lot's of fraud?...who knew? I'm sure $5 plans will fix everything and wake consumers up.
 
Well....the ACA is based on PROJECTED INCOME, and it's hard to prove the future using a past tax return...so what do you want people to do who have had recent life/income changes? The process of reviewing the life change documents has always been mysterious and inconsistent. No easy answers here.

100% agree.
"What do you project to earn this year?" -- "Great send us last year's tax return as proof!". The stupidity. If you want a projection, then this should be self-attesting. You can't prove something that hasn't occurred yet.

The border line between the Medicaid/ACA programs is a nightmare for people caught in the middle. Making it way too easy to get ACA with huge credits just isn't the right fix. Streamline the Medicaid enrollment process instead to make sure people who are being proactive don't have gaps in coverage.
Agree again. This is the nightmare. They systems believe you may qualify for Medicaid so it starts the process. Medicaid, at least for my state, are soooo far backlogged. People are getting their letters for additional information after the required date, and are therefore denied. Now they are eligible for subsidies.

It takes my state easily over 3, 4, or more months to process Medicaid. And if you're denied, that doesn't reopen the SEP for marketplace. These people are stuck between a rock and a hard place. If there's going be a push for Medicaid, that's fine, but have the resources for the masses because they can't even keep up with what they have now.

Bring back STM longer than 3 months. You have someone who applies on the exchange due to a loss of a job, they put "no income", then boom Medicaid eligible. They can try to guess the income, as a projection, but then it's the problem of subsidies being based on attestation versus actual income.
 
100% agree.
"What do you project to earn this year?" -- "Great send us last year's tax return as proof!". The stupidity. If you want a projection, then this should be self-attesting. You can't prove something that hasn't occurred yet.


Agree again. This is the nightmare. They systems believe you may qualify for Medicaid so it starts the process. Medicaid, at least for my state, are soooo far backlogged. People are getting their letters for additional information after the required date, and are therefore denied. Now they are eligible for subsidies.

It takes my state easily over 3, 4, or more months to process Medicaid. And if you're denied, that doesn't reopen the SEP for marketplace. These people are stuck between a rock and a hard place. If there's going be a push for Medicaid, that's fine, but have the resources for the masses because they can't even keep up with what they have now.

Bring back STM longer than 3 months. You have someone who applies on the exchange due to a loss of a job, they put "no income", then boom Medicaid eligible. They can try to guess the income, as a projection, but then it's the problem of subsidies being based on attestation versus actual income.
And a related problem is if you aren't sure if you will make enough to get ACA care. Then if you sign up but don't you need to pay back at least some of the subsidies. If you didn't sign up because of that but then cleared the mark at the end of the year you went without when you could have had insurance (even a bigger problem in states that didn't expand medicaid since you have nothing unless you pay full price if you are in that "gap").
 
And a related problem is if you aren't sure if you will make enough to get ACA care. Then if you sign up but don't you need to pay back at least some of the subsidies. If you didn't sign up because of that but then cleared the mark at the end of the year you went without when you could have had insurance (even a bigger problem in states that didn't expand medicaid since you have nothing unless you pay full price if you are in that "gap").
That's the real problem I run into 5 times a week in states that didn't expand Medicaid . 55 yr old woman who either doesn't work ( is lazy ) or works doing a cash gig . They lie and say they make $16 k . They file their return showing $1 k income for yr . They got a $10k subsidy they don't have to pay back . It looks like the new aca rules in 2026 if the computer cant cross check your tax returns you'll have to provide concrete proof . Under Biden when they were asking for income proof you simply sent in a spread sheet showing month by month income with no real proof . As far as the new rules causing chaos . Trump could care less . You don't like it don't take the ins out
 
100% agree.
"What do you project to earn this year?" -- "Great send us last year's tax return as proof!". The stupidity. If you want a projection, then this should be self-attesting. You can't prove something that hasn't occurred yet.


Agree again. This is the nightmare. They systems believe you may qualify for Medicaid so it starts the process. Medicaid, at least for my state, are soooo far backlogged. People are getting their letters for additional information after the required date, and are therefore denied. Now they are eligible for subsidies.

It takes my state easily over 3, 4, or more months to process Medicaid. And if you're denied, that doesn't reopen the SEP for marketplace. These people are stuck between a rock and a hard place. If there's going be a push for Medicaid, that's fine, but have the resources for the masses because they can't even keep up with what they have now.

Bring back STM longer than 3 months. You have someone who applies on the exchange due to a loss of a job, they put "no income", then boom Medicaid eligible. They can try to guess the income, as a projection, but then it's the problem of subsidies being based on attestation versus actual income.

Agreed. This whole illogical (and obviously) liberal-created system makes zero sense and needs to be scrapped. Getting government involved with insurance is a detriment to consumers. Nothing but confusion, bloat, headaches, and much higher costs. Health insurance should NEVER be tied to what a person makes in a year. Especially in this system that is essentially made for business owners who have very little clue about what they're gonna make in the upcoming year. It makes ZERO sense....never has and never will.
 
That's the real problem I run into 5 times a week in states that didn't expand Medicaid . 55 yr old woman who either doesn't work ( is lazy ) or works doing a cash gig . They lie and say they make $16 k . They file their return showing $1 k income for yr . They got a $10k subsidy they don't have to pay back . It looks like the new aca rules in 2026 if the computer cant cross check your tax returns you'll have to provide concrete proof . Under Biden when they were asking for income proof you simply sent in a spread sheet showing month by month income with no real proof . As far as the new rules causing chaos . Trump could care less . You don't like it don't take the ins out

And what's worse, in these scenarios, they are getting the full CSRs so paying a fraction of the costs....
 
How many on this thread ACTUALLY sell ACA plans?
To shop you have to update the application beginning in 2023. That updates income, etc.
The system pulls in data as we are updating the app-you really can't lie.
Oh and when they send you to Medicaid (as happened to my client last year) the Medicaid office does nothing and 12/15 comes and goes....

"Well....the ACA is based on PROJECTED INCOME, and it's hard to prove the future using a past tax return...so what do you want people to do who have had recent life/income changes?"
 
Back
Top