Had an existing married subsidized ACA client call me today to discuss reporting an income increase for this year. He starting talking about his CPA deciding whether they should file jointly or separately......which immediately caused me to say "no joint file....not eligible for subsidy"
Client went back to CPA who said "not true...there is an IRS loophole that allows this"......and they were told to tell HC.gov they would file jointly, but when the time comes, not required to do so. Odd that if you say "NO" to joint file, it does not allow a subsidy.
I'm not going to argue with a CPA on tax laws, but I find it odd. Any comments, or am I missing something? I've only been doing this since ACA started. It matters not to me at the end of the day....other than the perjury statement that the client is agreeing to...so its technically their problem, not mine.
Client went back to CPA who said "not true...there is an IRS loophole that allows this"......and they were told to tell HC.gov they would file jointly, but when the time comes, not required to do so. Odd that if you say "NO" to joint file, it does not allow a subsidy.
I'm not going to argue with a CPA on tax laws, but I find it odd. Any comments, or am I missing something? I've only been doing this since ACA started. It matters not to me at the end of the day....other than the perjury statement that the client is agreeing to...so its technically their problem, not mine.