You may consider SS a welfare program but the government refers to it as INSURANCE. Unlike welfare programs, individuals pay directly into it and then receive benefits in porportion to what they paid. One reason for the shortfall i SS over the years the govt. has allowed people who did not pay their fair share to draw benefits. Plus, the trust fund has not been managed wisely over the years. But, those facts have nothing to do with the fact it is an insurance program. You can call a cat a dog but it will still meow.Yes. I am very aware of that. There are also income caps on FICA assessments.
SS absolutely is a welfare program.
we have tried to frame a law which will give some measure of protection to the average citizen and to his family against the loss of a job and against poverty-ridden old age."--
President Roosevelt upon signing Social Security Act
I dont mean its bad. Im stating a fact. SS is meant to be a social welfare program. Not a retirement account.
I am in favor of having SS in theory. And it is an essential part of many retirees survival.
And that is part of my point. It is essential for many. But we pay the largest amounts to those who dont need it. The average payment is $2k a month. But those who dont need the income.... are paid on average $4k per month. Now, how do you think that impacts what the low income beneficiaries receive?
People wanting to treat is as a retirement account, is exactly why it has become the monstrosity it is today. Benefits have grown to cover those who dont actually need it.... because "want whats theirs".... out of a social safety net system...