Dleathers
New Member
- 16
Imagine you trusted your lead source, they did something shady, and you ended up with a letter from a TCPA litigator. Should your lead source pay the bill?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
True.Ignorance of the law and understanding the responsibility of representing someone else... is not an excuse.
They've done some narrowing on this. A cellphone isn't an ADTS.The ambiguous laws around TCPA (even your cellphone is technically an ADTS) is making me consider removing all carrier logos from my website. I'm more likely to be sued for "autodialing" because a litigator can see I'm affiliated with big carriers with some deep pockets. When my pockets are pretty shallow. If my pockets were deep, I wouldn't be sitting here cold calling you on a Sunday afternoon!
I can see the arguments for how it's the agent's fault based on the previous responses. But if the lead source says the they are guaranteed compliant, verified against the DNC list, etc in their disclosures, how is it NOT their fault?
You're sitting with me while I go over the life insurance option, for instance, trusting me that what I say is true. Why is the standard lower for lead sources? It shouldn't be. And how would one conduct due diligence? Go over each name and number and compare it to some national registry?
I'm new, but what am I missing?
Your response is good ... mine is better.There is the DNC registry [EXTERNAL LINK] - National Do Not Call Registry that you're supposed to verify each number with before making an outbound call. I believe some dialing services may scrub the list for you?