This coverage comes into play as a result of property damage from a "covered peril". In this case, the peril is earthquake and the coverage has been added by endorsement. This coverage carries a large 15% deductible (15% of the total building coverage by location), so if a loss does occur, and the building damage extensive, it may still be under the deductible so no structural repair/replace dollars come into play.
However, the damage has caused the tenant to be forced to move out of the building & rent somewhere else.
The question is this: Does the "Business Income & Extra Expense" coverage still provide protection to the building owner even though the property damage aspect of the loss would be closed?
I can find no policy/endorsement language that mentions anything about the deductible coming into play that would effect this coverage being applied...….Thanks for your thoughts!
However, the damage has caused the tenant to be forced to move out of the building & rent somewhere else.
The question is this: Does the "Business Income & Extra Expense" coverage still provide protection to the building owner even though the property damage aspect of the loss would be closed?
I can find no policy/endorsement language that mentions anything about the deductible coming into play that would effect this coverage being applied...….Thanks for your thoughts!