I believe you're referring to @rousemark. I think he posted on fraternals a year or so ago. Just don't hold me to it.Ok, so there is something else I guess I need to consider if I decide to do this.
Possible approx decrease in annual premium of $1K if I use a fraternal insurer.
I can't remember the specific issues any more, I just remember reading discussions about fraternal vs non-fraternal several years ago and deciding I would prefer to have non-fraternal coverage if I ever had to choose.
Years ago, I used Midland National for people that were 80 plus. They were quite liberal on their age range back then and quite competitive.
But that was years ago and always UL. No idea what they're doing now.