Accountable Care Organizations?

stuy119

Guru
1000 Post Club
1,896
Really? This is their "solution" to decreasing costs?

HHS issues ACO guidance | BenefitsPro

The Obama administration on Thursday outlined a new approach to medical care that it said could mean higher quality and less risk for patients, while also saving millions of dollars for taxpayers.

The plan involves accountable care organizations, which are networks of hospitals, doctors, rehabilitation centers and other providers. They would work together to cut out duplicative tests and procedures, prevent medical errors, and focus on keeping patients healthier and out of the emergency room.

"We need to bring the days of fragmented care to an end," Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said as she announced a proposal regulation that defines how the networks would operate within Medicare.

If things work out, medical providers would share in the savings. If the experiment fails, they're likely to get stuck with part of any additional costs.

Sebelius said early estimates are that Medicare could save as much as $960 million over three years. That's not a whole lot for a $550-billion-a-year program, but officials say it's a start. The estimate was prepared by Medicare's office of the actuary, known for its independence.

Get a freakin' clue.
 
Sounds like - HMO to me. Except for:

If things work out, medical providers would share in the savings. If the experiment fails, they're likely to get stuck with part of any additional costs.

WTH does that mean. If the patient doesn't die? I'm confused.
 
Yeah, I don't see how that's any different than the current system.
 
The plan involves accountable care organizations, which are networks of hospitals, doctors, rehabilitation centers and other providers. Meaning - Restrictive network, like an HMO, but very small like a local group of hospitals and doctors.

They would work together to cut out duplicative tests and procedures... Meaning - Rationed care and Restrictions - all services under one roof, controlled by one group of doctors/facilities. No self-referrals to specialists outside the local group of physicians/facilities. Originally meant to be logical (like making sure you don't receive 2 MRI's), it actually severely limits your ability to get a second surgical opinion or to go outside the ACO's very small medical group to attain care at a facility that you believe is in your best interest (like the Mayo Clinic, for instance).

prevent medical errors, and focus on keeping patients healthier and out of the emergency room. Meaning - the old HMO system

If things work out, medical providers would share in the savings. Meaning - financial incentive to withhold or delay care. If they save money by not providing the services to you, the doctors & facilities share in the financial savings. The doctors & hospitals actually partly serve as an insurer, because they are taking on risks & rewards based on the amount of care you are likely to receive. It's been done before, and those medical groups that did it before very quickly realized they should get out of the insurance business!

If the experiment fails, they're likely to get stuck with part of any additional costs. Meaning - if you cost the group too much money, they should either get you off their list of enrollees, or else delay your testing or medical care until you die. Otherwise, your continued life support is taking away their nickel.
 
If the experiment fails, they're likely to get stuck with part of any additional costs. Meaning - if you cost the group too much money, they should either get you off their list of enrollees, or else delay your testing or medical care until you die. Otherwise, your continued life support is taking away their nickel.

Your insight is enjoyable. The statement was not as innocuous as it sounded.
 
Read the article again, AC. You missed the most important part.

Obama administration officials say the new entities are saving money while improving care,

Obama has indeed bent the cost curve.

As our official bean counter, how much has Obama pissed away on this Obamacare experiment?
 
Read the article again, AC. You missed the most important part.



Obama has indeed bent the cost curve.

As our official bean counter, how much has Obama pissed away on this Obamacare experiment?

CBO: Cost of ObamaCare subsidies climbs by 11 percent | TheHill

CBO says $660 Billion in 2016 alone, just on APTC's...

Don't forget, in 2013, the CBO estimated the **10 YEAR** cost, 2014-2023, to be $1.075T. https://www.cbo.gov/publication/44176

This one year will cost more than half of their 10-year total, and costs are only going up...
 

Latest posts

Back
Top