- 10,687
That comes across to me as conceptually similar to the idea of paying an advisor an AUM fee of 1%, in order to gain a 6% initial premium bonus increase for the annuity. I don't know how to assess the potential value of an increase in the initial amount of the annuity in exchange for the privilege of paying an annual fee. I'm sure there are some fancy math procedures to do it if you want to give the math procedures some assumptions about the stock market.
Its impact to the Client is the same. The Agent does not get paid the 0.95% Fee, that goes to the Carrier. Agent gets paid normal commission schedule.
To make the math easy, with 0% gains in the policy; a 1% fee over 11 years makes the 16% bonus a 5% bonus.
So the 7y and 10y are the same net effect over 11 years if the policy receives no gains.
That means the only real difference is the higher amount of interest received each year by the 10y product with a higher starting value y1.
If you deposit $100k...
$105k x 5% = $5,250 per year
$116k x 5% = $5,800 per year
You commit to 4 extra years for an extra $750 a year in interest. (not counting the compounding)
So theoretically, you should have over $8,250 more in gains after 11 years with the 16% Bonus.
But the real question: "is that worth tying up your money for the extra 4 years?"
And that answer is "it depends on the clients situation"
Last edited: