- Thread starter
- #51
Think how much less life insurance would get sold if companies went around contesting policies past the 2nd year. The public would think of it like individual health insurance (right or wrong, people think health insurance is recended improperly.)
Some companies would issue anything and challenge it later if they could. Even with only two years to challenge certain companies do very little to verify upfront with FE policies.
You are right. The 2 year contestability is there for the good of the public and to keep these things out of court. Again, I can find no case where a company denied benefits outside the 2 year period for lying about health etc. A companymay try this one day to make an example out of someone. That is true. It is also true, in my opinion, they would lose the case.