Hello -- Just joined this site as a non-insurance lay person because I have a rather specific question that my research is not finding is specifically addressed in all the searching I've done.
TL;DR - In your "opinion" -- Is it believable that a keyman policy would be honored for a bankrupt small business that was dissolved 20+ years ago?
My father-in-law aquired keyman insurance from a manufacturing business that went bankrupt over 20 years ago. There have been a couple of smaller business endeavors since then.
I'm told that the policy, after some time, was arranged in a way that the premiums would be paid from the value of the policy or its invested values or some such, and is still in effect. I'm trying to get reliable information from my in-laws, but in essence, I distrust that I'm getting all the information, or what I'm told is credible.
I don't have any interest in the policy, other than to ensure that at my father-in-laws passing, that there is a reasonable belief that my mother-in-law would be able to make a claim and get benefit. This is effectively how they have planned for her survival at his passing.
What I'm asking is solely an opinion question, not a legal one. The terms of the contract are unknown to me and obviously the only thing that matters. I'm a skeptic, and a planner, looking to see if this meets with the sensibilities of experts, and if there is a need to have a contingency plan in place...
Thanks for your consideration..
TL;DR - In your "opinion" -- Is it believable that a keyman policy would be honored for a bankrupt small business that was dissolved 20+ years ago?
My father-in-law aquired keyman insurance from a manufacturing business that went bankrupt over 20 years ago. There have been a couple of smaller business endeavors since then.
I'm told that the policy, after some time, was arranged in a way that the premiums would be paid from the value of the policy or its invested values or some such, and is still in effect. I'm trying to get reliable information from my in-laws, but in essence, I distrust that I'm getting all the information, or what I'm told is credible.
I don't have any interest in the policy, other than to ensure that at my father-in-laws passing, that there is a reasonable belief that my mother-in-law would be able to make a claim and get benefit. This is effectively how they have planned for her survival at his passing.
What I'm asking is solely an opinion question, not a legal one. The terms of the contract are unknown to me and obviously the only thing that matters. I'm a skeptic, and a planner, looking to see if this meets with the sensibilities of experts, and if there is a need to have a contingency plan in place...
Thanks for your consideration..