Thank you to all who patiently led me through the process of NML vs. MML; now the question is, what is the down side to starting as a career agent with Mass Mutual as opposed to starting as an independent. I can get health benefits from my wife's employment, at a reasonable cost, about equal to the 1/3 it will cost be at Mass. I am attracted to the pension contribution Mass makes, the seemingly generous over ride for maintaining my own office and the assistance available for "inside" agents from the various specialists (at no cost to me-- unlike NML which requires a split). I've been with a private BD before and I know the payouts are more lucrative to start, but with Mass they at least go back to first dollar when you hit various breakpoints-- in the past I consistently did about 100K of GDC, but my guess is it will take me a year or two to get back there and then I assume I will surpass that. So, what think thee o men of great wisdom? Mass let's you start in house and then go brokerage if it is suitable. What is the down side? The upfront "financing" the first 3 years seems difficult to turn down. The GA is a quality guy and the in house experts are quite amiable. What am I missing other than my mind for going through a career change in my late 50's. Please, no mid life crisis jokes, I've already had 3 midlife events and I'm way past midlife. 
