G
Guest
Guest
Here are the facts (lets not argue them).
I cold-called a bond (constructions surety) broker to ask if she wanted to work with me with selling Colonial to her groups (mostly construction firms, obviously). She said yes... was very excited about it (still is.) She has life/health license (obviously). She has a big book... but not getting larger due to problems in the construction industry (no new homes being built/sold here, etc.)
I met with her. We really hit it off well... we're about same age (60), same background, etc. In conversation she said she has friends who want $200K 10 year term life on each spouse (age 64 and 63). She is not experienced in life, nor am I. I could have handled it... but decided not to (don't ask... not important why.) We decided to bring in a 3rd party.
I brought in the life agent (Colonial district manager) whom I trust. Good man. Honest (so far to me anyway!.) He is very experienced in the business... also has a Series 7. We did not talk split or compensation of any type.
He ran the quotes, he made the presentation to the prospects with both me and the bond broker in the room... and they are going to take 2 policies, one on each life. This was slam dunk easy! (There were some reasons on why agent didn't do a 'first to die'... not important here.) All the premiums were in the $900 per year range per policy (Old Colony, West Coast, Banner, etc.... they took Old Colony.) Agent will help them fill out the apps this week and schedule the paramed next. (These people are quite wealthy... they want the policy to cover the mortgage of a new house until they get a "windfall" from an inheritance 4 or 5 years down the line. I don't know more than that.) They will probably not keep policy full 10 years.
Why didn't I talk about split up-front? Not my way. I do 'good things' for colleagues (via referrals, etc.) and leave it up to them to do the 'right thing.' That's how I ran my computer consulting biz for 25 years and very rarely got shafted by anyone I sent business to... and if I did... well I knew not to work with them ever again... and didn't. When they ask "Al, it's a $100,000 consulting contract, what do you want out of it?" I would answer "Just do what you think is fair." 99% of my colleagues did more than what I thought would be fair!
By convention or 'industry standard' should I and/or the broker expect the agent to do some kind of split? Broker is MY contact and the insureds are HER friends. Agent would not have a case without two of us. What is the 'right thing' for the agent to do in this case... or is nothing the right thing? What would YOU do if you made this sale? No wrong answer.... and I don't expect there to be only ONE answer.
Thanks.
Al
I cold-called a bond (constructions surety) broker to ask if she wanted to work with me with selling Colonial to her groups (mostly construction firms, obviously). She said yes... was very excited about it (still is.) She has life/health license (obviously). She has a big book... but not getting larger due to problems in the construction industry (no new homes being built/sold here, etc.)
I met with her. We really hit it off well... we're about same age (60), same background, etc. In conversation she said she has friends who want $200K 10 year term life on each spouse (age 64 and 63). She is not experienced in life, nor am I. I could have handled it... but decided not to (don't ask... not important why.) We decided to bring in a 3rd party.
I brought in the life agent (Colonial district manager) whom I trust. Good man. Honest (so far to me anyway!.) He is very experienced in the business... also has a Series 7. We did not talk split or compensation of any type.
He ran the quotes, he made the presentation to the prospects with both me and the bond broker in the room... and they are going to take 2 policies, one on each life. This was slam dunk easy! (There were some reasons on why agent didn't do a 'first to die'... not important here.) All the premiums were in the $900 per year range per policy (Old Colony, West Coast, Banner, etc.... they took Old Colony.) Agent will help them fill out the apps this week and schedule the paramed next. (These people are quite wealthy... they want the policy to cover the mortgage of a new house until they get a "windfall" from an inheritance 4 or 5 years down the line. I don't know more than that.) They will probably not keep policy full 10 years.
Why didn't I talk about split up-front? Not my way. I do 'good things' for colleagues (via referrals, etc.) and leave it up to them to do the 'right thing.' That's how I ran my computer consulting biz for 25 years and very rarely got shafted by anyone I sent business to... and if I did... well I knew not to work with them ever again... and didn't. When they ask "Al, it's a $100,000 consulting contract, what do you want out of it?" I would answer "Just do what you think is fair." 99% of my colleagues did more than what I thought would be fair!
By convention or 'industry standard' should I and/or the broker expect the agent to do some kind of split? Broker is MY contact and the insureds are HER friends. Agent would not have a case without two of us. What is the 'right thing' for the agent to do in this case... or is nothing the right thing? What would YOU do if you made this sale? No wrong answer.... and I don't expect there to be only ONE answer.
Thanks.
Al