That's what you've never understood in all these yrs . Most people until the last few that bought mapd were mostly lower middle income to low income people . Many never pay the hospital co pays . But a good agent like myself will show them a good hospital indemnity plan to cover the bigger out of pocket bills for $50-$75 a month . I show Medicare sup to all t-65's and few want them . Now if there already sick I'll highly recommend a sup . I think you have this reversed . I show a supp and mapd . You ONLY show supps . You're the biased one . I won't relist all the reasons why the med sup premium pool is in trouble Premiums will be a problem for many in the next 2 yrs .While Medigap has more exposure than MA, and does so without the benefit of taxpayer subsidies, they are also secondary payers to Medicare and only have to absorb 20% of the spillover Part B claims.
Medicare pays most of the Part A claim, everything but the $1676 deductible.
Most, but not all, T65's I talk to are healthy, but I would not expect someone who only pushes MA plans to know that. And if those same agents focus on low income folks with unhealthy lifestyles it would seem that folks gravitating to MA plans are looking for plans without a premium and low copays.
As long as they remain healthy, no question the MA plan is a good choice . . . but not so much when their health goes south and especially if they can't afford to pay the OOP.
It's a bit of a damned if you do, damned if you don't mess.
Last edited: