Carriers with obvious liberal underwriting should be a red flag.
I don't do as much underwritten business as I used to, but carriers I am familiar with, set a cap of 40 - 50 units daily.
There is no magical underwriting that allows one carrier to do something others can't/won't do and continue to do so with impunity.
For a long time BXGA used unisex rates and no load for tobacco use. They finally figured out the error of their ways and corrected to (birth) gender rates and a 12% adjustment for tobacco use.
Carriers that accept anyone who can fog a mirror and offer rates competitive with carriers who have "normal" underwriting rules are destined to crash & burn.
I don't do as much underwritten business as I used to, but carriers I am familiar with, set a cap of 40 - 50 units daily.
There is no magical underwriting that allows one carrier to do something others can't/won't do and continue to do so with impunity.
For a long time BXGA used unisex rates and no load for tobacco use. They finally figured out the error of their ways and corrected to (birth) gender rates and a 12% adjustment for tobacco use.
Carriers that accept anyone who can fog a mirror and offer rates competitive with carriers who have "normal" underwriting rules are destined to crash & burn.