We have not even breached the carriers that refuse to change IMO's after so many changes..... aka Foresters 3 and done policy implemented in 2011.
If you move to another IMO and it is the third time you are done, you have landed at that IMO for Life. Foresters issues a new ID number per IMO and they implemented a policy that only allows a maximum of 3 ID numbers in their system.
I have been doing this business now for over 25 years and I understand carriers reluctance to move IMO's. This system was established to eliminate the direct contracts and slide the Bad Debt to an IMO instead of Home Office and also to aide in distribution, not to mention the extra paperwork involved in switching IMO's
Agents have become too dependent on an IMO for their success and blame them for the lack of it. Most agents (never mind the carrier) submit directly to the carrier, get status updates and handle most issues and commission balances direct with the carrier. The IMO (as the carrier looks at it) is the marketing and training arm of the products the carrier is pushing through IMO's. Not whether or not leads systems stink or the agent did not get the training he wanted. (still asking for Street Level by the way), etc, etc.
Switching IMO's should be a choice of convenience, product diversity and increased opportunity with an agent. If you have no debt, the IMO should release. However, it is usually the agent's own shortfalls in their career choice that prompts the request.
Just one man's opinion...... Let 'er rip
If you move to another IMO and it is the third time you are done, you have landed at that IMO for Life. Foresters issues a new ID number per IMO and they implemented a policy that only allows a maximum of 3 ID numbers in their system.
I have been doing this business now for over 25 years and I understand carriers reluctance to move IMO's. This system was established to eliminate the direct contracts and slide the Bad Debt to an IMO instead of Home Office and also to aide in distribution, not to mention the extra paperwork involved in switching IMO's
Agents have become too dependent on an IMO for their success and blame them for the lack of it. Most agents (never mind the carrier) submit directly to the carrier, get status updates and handle most issues and commission balances direct with the carrier. The IMO (as the carrier looks at it) is the marketing and training arm of the products the carrier is pushing through IMO's. Not whether or not leads systems stink or the agent did not get the training he wanted. (still asking for Street Level by the way), etc, etc.
Switching IMO's should be a choice of convenience, product diversity and increased opportunity with an agent. If you have no debt, the IMO should release. However, it is usually the agent's own shortfalls in their career choice that prompts the request.
Just one man's opinion...... Let 'er rip