I.M.O ... F.M.O. ... WTF MO ...

You wan some a diss bacon boi !?!?!
All I'm say'n is ... IMO's aren't necessary ... didn't have one with UHC Medicare ... not that they paid out more because of it ... maybe if you're brand new ... I dunno ... I don't get ...
 
I'm sorry ... I get bored ... all b.s. aside, it is notable that UHC never wanted an IMO but the other supp. carriers did ..?
 
Last edited:
I'm just curious. I don't sell medicare. I would be annoyed if I had a direct contract much higher than the IMO contract. If they were the same, then what's the difference?
That was part of my "point" if I had one earlier ..? To me, we try and rationalize and look for consistency amongst common factions ... in this case, Medicare carriers, ... I don't know why some of us still try and make sense of things at this point in the game ... after all, there are people on here that think Kamala and the communists would have been a good idea and that knowing where are tax dollars go is a bad one ..? They all pay 20 - 22 points a supp., possibly because I had written a decent bit of "Golden Rule" even before it was under the UHone "umbrella ..." but that's a complete guess and just me speculating in lieu of any other rationale ..?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top