retired agent e and o still needed???

[Markthebroker]

Dude you were wrong . I called you out and now your bitch hurt . I made a statement and I was right . You need to apologize and say you were wrong .

This is why I think you're a clown, Don. You clearly didn't even read and/or understand what I said. You have a habit of this. That's why other people crap on you as well.

Go back and reread it. If you actually read and understand what I said, have confidence in your statement, then you would be thanking me for my original comment.

 

[PrivClientSG]

I've never seen an E&O premium stay the exact same over time, whether it be group or individual, and I've had both for a long time. Not saying it doesn't happen, but I've never seen it. I did have both go down once or twice, but then again, I think the coverage (contract language) changed.

 

[DonP]

I call BS in this statement

I've never seen an E&O premium stay the exact same over time, whether it be group or individual, and I've had both for a long time. Not saying it doesn't happen, but I've never seen it. I did have both go down once or twice, but then again, I think the coverage (contract language) changed.

Napa has . I got not reason to say otherwise . I have no idea why but it hasn't gone up . Actually as I recall the coverage was $1/$2 mil when I Started and is $1/$3 now . I don't think e&0 threw cal ins has risen either . I still see it advertised at about $450 a yr

 

[Allen Trent]

Napa has . I got not reason to say otherwise . I have no idea why but it hasn't gone up . Actually as I recall the coverage was $1/$2 mil when I Started and is $1/$3 now . I don't think e&0 threw cal ins has risen either . I still see it advertised at about $450 a yr

No, I am not questioning E&O rate. I was just calling BS on your statement of you assuring that all your posts were no BS

 

[DonP]

No, I am not questioning E&O rate. I was just calling BS on your statement that assuring that all your posts were no BS

No, I am not questioning E&O rate. I was just calling BS on your statement that assuring that all your posts were no BS

All my posts are 100% no bs . You got the right to believe what you want

 

[Markthebroker]

All my posts are 100% no bs . You got the right to believe what you want

I don't think it's an ethical issue with you, Don. I think it's a comprehension issue.

This is a perfect example, where you didn't understand my original post to you.

 

[Allen Trent]

All my posts are 100% no bs . You got the right to believe what you want

100%? Mine are at least 10% BS